UPC_CFI_2265/2025

Decisions and documents (1)

• 2026-05-07procedural

  Applicants:

  YEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd.

  Defendants:

  BARCO NV

  1. Waiving rights, and specifically waiving rights to request compensation, necessitates an explicit statement from the holder of such right. As such the fact that a party would have admitted the other party to be the “successful party” in first instance proceedings in the R. 353 RoP proceedings does not imply that the first party waived his right for compensation in R. 150 RoP proceedings as a “partial successful party”. 2. If the Court were to accept a decrease of the applicable ceiling based on the "partial success", it would be unreasonable to compensate the costs, incurred by the “partially successful party”, by deducting these costs from an already reduced ceiling. 3. If costs of “interpreters to follow the proceedings” were incurred in application of R. 109.4 RoP, they are excluded as “costs of the proceedings” (R. 109.5. RoP). 4. If no arguments are made regarding a specific costs for which reimbursement is requested, the request should be considered accepted.

  🔒 Unlock Official PDF