UPC_CFI_604/2026

Decisions and documents (1)

• 2026-07-03preliminary injunction

  Applicant:

  Ecovacs Robotics Co., Ltd.

  1. In the absence of any specific fact that is contested at the time of submitting the request, it is not in line with the outlined principles relevant for assessing a R. 190 RoP Request to conditionally ask for an overall documentation. R. 190 RoP is not for investigation of unknown facts but to produce evidence for substantiated, relevant and contested facts. 2. Although neither the Enforcement Directive nor the UPCA nor the RoP set out a timeframe for submitting a R. 190 RoP Request that would make it (in)admissible, and there is also no procedural framework indicating that such request can only be introduced once all parties' arguments have been finalised, it is clear that a R. 190 RoP Request could be dismissed if the Court deems it to be too early in the proceedings, based on the circumstances of the case.

  Judge: Bérénice Thom • Panel: Bérénice Thom🔒 Unlock Official PDF