🇪🇺 UPC

UPC_CFI_617/2024

Court

Munich Local Division

Type of action

infringement

Patent

EP3016464

METHOD FOR MEASURING DISCOVERY SIGNAL, BASE STATION, AND TERMINAL

Language

Claimant / applicant

Advanced Standard Communication LLC

Defendant / respondent

XIAOMI Inc.
XIAOMI Communications Co., Ltd
XIAOMI Technology Netherlands B.V.
XIAOMI Technology Germany GmbH

Track this case

Get an email when a new order or decision is published in UPC_CFI_617/2024.

Decisions and documents (3)

2026-05-19procedural
Claimant:
Advanced Standard Communication LLC
Defendants:
XIAOMI Communications Co., Ltd; XIAOMI Inc.; XIAOMI Technology Germany GmbH; XIAOMI Technology Netherlands B.V.
Infringement Action. Document: 2026-05-19 - Order - joint hearing of CFI_617-24 CFI_398-25 CFI_1321-25 and 1340-26 - signed_all and anynomized.pdf. Case page: https://www.unifiedpatentcourt.org/en/node/183335
Judge: Dr. Daniel Voß • Panel: Dr. Daniel Voß
2026-04-23procedural
Claimant:
Advanced Standard Communication LLC
Defendants:
XIAOMI Communications Co., Ltd; XIAOMI Inc.; XIAOMI Technology Germany GmbH; XIAOMI Technology Netherlands B.V.
Infringement Action. Document: 2026-05-19 - Order - Correction of order of 2026-04-23 - CFI_617-24 - signed_all and anonymized.pdf. Case page: https://www.unifiedpatentcourt.org/en/node/183313
Judge: Dr. Daniel Voß • Panel: Dr. Daniel Voß
2026-04-23procedural
Claimant:
Advanced Standard Communication LLC
Defendants:
XIAOMI Communications Co., Ltd; XIAOMI Inc.; XIAOMI Technology Germany GmbH; XIAOMI Technology Netherlands B.V.
A bank guarantee provided by a Defendant, as part of an objection of compulsory licence under antitrust law, as security for any potential licence payment obligations towards the Claimant and thus to avert an injunction claim asserted by the Claimant (“FRAND security”), does not, in principle, relieve the Claimant of the obligation to provide security for costs, even if the amount of the bank guarantee exceeds the amount of the security for costs. Neither does the bank guarantee constitute a valuable asset of the Claimant to which the Defendant may have recourse for recovery of his costs, nor does the provision of the bank guarantee allow the conclusion that the Defendant is obliged to pay licence fees to the Claimant against which he could set off a claim for recoverable costs. Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Local Division Munich issued on 23 April 2026
Judge: Dr. Daniel Voß • Panel: Dr. Daniel Voß

Weekly digest

A weekly email summarising new published decisions across European patent courts.