UPC_CFI_642/2025
- Laitram L.L.C.
- ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Systems
- ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Syste
Track this case
Get an email when a new order or decision is published in UPC_CFI_642/2025.
Decisions and documents (2)
- 2026-04-02procedural
- Klägerin:
- Laitram L.L.C.
- Beklagte:
- ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Syste
1. If the Court invites the parties to comment on various proposed dates for the interim conference or the oral hearing, UPC representatives are expected to respond promptly, and no later than the expiration of the deadline set for them. 2. Once a date has been set, subsequent requests for a postponement will be rejected, unless there are substantial grounds which, evident to the Court, make it unreasonable for a party to attend, thereby justifying a postponement in the specific case. The compelling reasons for a postponement must be set out in the application for postponement so that they may be taken into account in the Court’s discretionary decision. 3. This also applies if the late request refers to one of the other dates originally proposed by the Court. Once a date has been agreed upon with the parties, potential alternative dates are generally no longer reserved for a specific proceeding.
- 2026-04-02procedural
- Claimant:
- Laitram L.L.C.
- Defendant:
- ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Systems
dismissed
1. If the Court invites the parties to comment on various proposed dates for the interim conference or the oral hearing, UPC representatives are expected to respond promptly, and no later than the expiration of the deadline set for them. 2. Once a date has been set, subsequent requests for a postponement will be rejected, unless there are substantial grounds which, evident to the Court, make it unreasonable for a party to attend, thereby justifying a postponement in the specific case. The compelling reasons for a postponement must be set out in the application for postponement so that they may be taken into account in the Court’s discretionary decision. 3. This also applies if the late request refers to one of the other dates originally proposed by the Court. Once a date has been agreed upon with the parties, potential alternative dates are generally no longer reserved for a specific proceeding.
Weekly digest
A weekly email summarising new published decisions across European patent courts.