UPC_CFI_730/2025
- Nera Innovations Ltd.
- Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
- Xiaomi Inc.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
- Xiaomi Comunication Co.
Track this case
Get an email when a new order or decision is published in UPC_CFI_730/2025.
Decisions and documents (2)
- 2026-01-05procedural
- Klägerin:
- Nera Innovations Ltd.
- Beklagte:
- Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.; Xiaomi Inc.; Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH; Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
1. In principle, a party is always entitled to be represented before the EPO by a legal representative and a patent attorney jointly, i.e. by two authorised representatives, Art. 48(4) UPCA. 2. However, appeal proceedings under Rule 220.2 RoP concerning a specific procedural issue do not require the involvement of more than one authorised representative, R. 151.1 R.P. 3. The upper limit of reimbursable representation costs cannot be used for the assessment of costs in appeal proceedings under R. 220.2 R.P. concerning procedural sub-issues. 4. A party to the dispute must always be allowed to participate in an oral hearing before the UPC with at least one natural person and to incur the corresponding travel expenses. 5. Even if a party is successful in proceedings for the assessment of costs under Rule 150 of the RoP, it must generally bear its own costs incurred in the cost proceedings.
- 2026-01-05procedural
- Klägerin:
- Nera Innovations Ltd.
- Beklagte:
- Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.; Xiaomi Inc.; Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH; Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.
1. In principle, a party is always entitled to be represented before the EPO by a legal representative and a patent attorney jointly, i.e. by two authorised representatives, Art. 48(4) UPCA. 2. However, appeal proceedings under Rule 220.2 RoP concerning a specific procedural issue do not require the involvement of more than one authorised representative, R. 151.1 R.P. 3. The upper limit of reimbursable representation costs cannot be used for the assessment of costs in appeal proceedings under R. 220.2 R.P. concerning procedural sub-issues. 4. A party to the dispute must always be allowed to participate in an oral hearing before the UPC with at least one natural person and to incur the corresponding travel expenses. 5. Even if a party is successful in proceedings for the assessment of costs under Rule 150 of the RoP, it must generally bear its own costs incurred in the cost proceedings.
Weekly digest
A weekly email summarising new published decisions across European patent courts.