UPC_CoA_61/2026

Decisions and documents (4)

• 2026-10-05procedural

  Applicant:

  SharkNinja Operating LLC

  Respondents:

  Groupe SEB France; Groupe SEB WMF Consumer GmbH; S.A.S. SEB; SEB International Service (SIS)

  • Panel: Patricia Rombach🔒 Unlock Official PDF
• 2026-08-21procedural

  Appellant:

  SharkNinja Operating LLC

  Respondents:

  Groupe SEB France; Groupe SEB WMF Consumer GmbH; S.A.S. SEB; SEB International Service (SIS)

  Where two patents are the subject of the proceedings and the claim or application is successful in respect of only one patent, it is generally appropriate to apportion the costs in proportion to the values of the two patents. However, it may also be regarded as appropriate to order the unsuccessful party to bear the costs attributable to the respective patent. K

  Judge: Patricia Rombach • Panel: Max Tilmann, Patricia Rombach, Ingeborg Simonsson🔒 Unlock Official PDF
• 2026-06-10procedural

  Appeal RoP220.1. Document: order confidentiality SEB request 10 June 2026 signed_Anonymized.pdf. Case page: https://www.unifiedpatentcourt.org/en/node/183474

  🔒 Unlock Official PDF
• 2026-05-22procedural

  Appellant:

  SharkNinja Operating LLC

  Respondents:

  Groupe SEB France; Groupe SEB WMF Consumer GmbH; S.A.S. SEB; SEB International Service (SIS)

  - In the interest of legal certainty, to guarantee the authenticity of a procedural document and to exclude the risk that it is not in fact the work of the person authorized for that purpose, the procedural document itself must bear an electronic signature. - R. 9.3 (a) RoP expressly allows the retroactive extension of a time period. This means that an extension order can be issued after the time period has expired and also that the Court may grant a time extension even if the applicant lodged the request for extension after the time period has expired.

  Judge: Patricia Rombach • Panel: Max Tilmann, Patricia Rombach, Ingeborg Simonsson🔒 Unlock Official PDF